American Apparel’s advertising alchemy
Ever since the store opened in July, our campus has been absolutely plastered with ads from American Apparel, a store that sells a label-less product with a colour selection that rivals Pantone. Their outerwear truly is of great quality; their underwear I don’t own, so I can’t really judge it. What started as a company offering a sweatshop-free alternative for screenprinters needing blank slates for their designs opened retail stores that sell the same blank slate product. How does one even begin to sell a vertical-market product to the public in a high-end area? Why do people buy their stuff? It’s not so much the product selling itself. In fact, I’ll base American Apparel’s success on absolutely nothing more than a low-end Canon Digital SLR, a Polaroid 600, and extremely liberal use of Helvetica. It is American Apparel’s marketing that is absolutely brilliant.
Skip all of the fancy vector images, typefaces, and patterns: American Apparel ads are the Lomography of marketing. Their sole graphical element is a simple photograph; their sole typeface is Helvetica.
A few months ago, I went with my sister to Royal Oak for a fashion photo shoot of hers. Her photographer, Jun Pino (whose photographic work has been used for countless magazines and fashion labels,) gave us a bit of insight into American Apparel’s photographic methods: 1. Grab Polaroid. 2. Point at boy or girl wearing American Apparel. 3. Push shutter button. The resulting image goes everywhere, barely edited, if at all. A dark-haired girl in a yellow shirt adorned the window of a Royal Oak store - with a pimple on her face. At the nearly seven-foot-tall size of the photo, the zit alone was probably the size of my hand. It was blatantly obvious from one photograph what American Apparel was doing. A fashion company with flawed models? This down-to-earth photography is then mated with the world’s most popular sans-serif to make an image that defines why the company continues to grow. It’s an image explained in four pieces.
The scenes, the typefaces, the clothes, and the people are all entirely ordinary
This reflects the company’s product beautifully. Their shirts are basic; only the most educated eye or touch will tell you that it came from American Apparel. Their photos are shot in ordinary locations with lots of simple lighting. I swear I sat next to the girl on this card in Starbucks a week ago.
It looks like the designer of the card pictured above wasn’t even trying. White background. Plain, almost default kerning and alignment on the Helvetica. As people, we can make an important psychological connection to this: we’re not models. We’re students, we’re designers, we’re musicians, investment bankers, yoga teachers, postal workers, journalists, and waitstaff. We work crappy hourly jobs and go home to our decidedly uneventful, lonely lives. We’re pretty damn ordinary, and our subconscious sighs in relief. Finally, some company highlights us for who we are. That is exactly our subconscious process, and this state of ordinary is appealing because we have something unabashedly in common with it.
American Apparel’s message is clear
It doesn’t get any simpler than Helvetica Neue 75 Bold. No goofy slogans or advertising memes à la Gap, just what the deal is. That is all that needs to be said here.
It’s casual
I don’t exactly have many days in the year when I can dress up in a suit and be attacked by journalists and the paparazzi (Okay, excluding working at the Daily.) I look kind of lame if I go to class in a dress shirt or sport coat. Armani shirts and 7 jeans have their place, and it’s definitely when I’m not in class. Wear anything at all to class other than UGGs, a North Face jacket, or Abercrombie and you are probably considered way-too-Manhattan for the homogenous sorority girls and Abercrombie-addicted frat pack. Either that or you’re gay.
This is where American Apparel’s marketing wins again: it’s basic. There’s no unnecessary branding. You aren’t tromping down the street in a shirt that reads American Apparel in their characteristic Helvetica; you can blend in and let solely your colour choice be your expressive outlet. (Note: If you get a compliment on your colour selection, don’t bring up complementary colour.)
Most importantly, it’s accessible
Let’s be honest here: American Apparel’s models aren’t worthy of a New York City runway in their photographed state. Period. Even with a hefty dose of MAC or an Adobe Healing Brush, they’d still look way out of place in a Versace ad.
Let’s be honest again, this time with ourselves: Unless you’re in my sister’s industry, you’re probably no supermodel, either. I’m most certainly not. Hell, the agencies I worked with eventually throttled my work off to radio voiceovers. The majority of us are awkward and physically flawed. Although my sister’s co-workers, all brilliantly hot, constantly preach the wonders of plastic surgery, there’s something philosophically, if not monetarily, impractical in turning yourself into a shell of silicone to retaliate against the shitty DNA you got when you were born. I’m a designer, not a model. I’m not beautiful. $60,000.00 later, I could be prettier, but I’d still not have solved half of my aesthetic issues in search of a perfect image. It’s also really not worth the recovery time.
The girl on this American Apparel card in front of me is most certainly no Rachel Alexander. Neither are the ones in the windows of the store half a block from my apartment. Regardless, this girl gives us insight into a rogue in an industry that spends very little time looking at who the majority of us are and what we look like. The girls in these Polaroids are beautiful for who they are in their most basic, non-Photoshop-assisted form. Hell, I’d actually have a chance with some of the girls in these photos. Okay, maybe five. Two.
This portrayal of accessibility is what I really believe is the keystone in American Apparel’s success, with all other parts of their marketing being auxiliary to this accessibility. Although American Apparel requires a photo submission with your employment application, as long as you aren’t morbidly obese or lacking hygiene, you’ll probably be accepted. American Apparel works so well because it makes anyone feel important and aesthetically content, if not supermodel-like. They make any photographer with a Lomo LC-A feel talented. They make any designer with simply Illustrator and the Helvetica family feel like the next Milton Glaser. They aren’t afraid to simply show people as people, with differing images and bodies. People like myself: some scrawny, 157-pound, 5′10″ designer with a big nose, writing in a Moleskine in a coffee shop. People like the girl in this ad: a Mediterranean-looking girl with wavy, coarse dark hair and eyebrows that really should see some paraffin wax. People like the girl a couple of tables down from me, who just dumped half of a mocha onto her beat-up Powerbook G4. Is that an American Apparel scarf that she’s soaking that mess up with? I think I should probably go help her clean up that mess.
Eston is probably too busy writing, drinking a mocha, or dreaming about American Apparel models. E-mail him and maybe he’ll respond once he’s run out of ink and Polaroid film.
Article Abstract
Posted 8 December 2005. Approx. 1,207 words.
I explore American Apparel’s design and marketing, only to find that the Lomography of apparel has gotten absolutely everything right in four steps, none of which include a supermodel.
From Our Sponsors
Comments
Comments RSS Feed for “this post”
I’d love to know what you think is particularly “horseshit” about this. From the looks of the site you left as your homepage, I’d say that you’re on the fringe of society.
Because it’s still a corporation. Marketing is marketing, not truth. It’s meant to deceive. They found a genius look, but that doesn’t really mean anything past the influence it will have on people buying their stuff. It’s taking advantage of the psychology of its market to sell better. I’d be happier if quality made businesses more successful than clever marketing, but that’s not how the market works sadly. That’s why we have shit like True Religion jeans, terrible quality denim, they fall apart, they look ugly, but they’re popular because some celebrities started wearing them and they’ve got a neat company image.
Paying americans to make their clothes instead of sweatshops is a nice progressive idea, but it’s also a marketing ploy that they use. Their clothes fit well and they have a stylish company image but their clothes are poorly made (they frequently fall apart) and very overpriced (you can find their tshirts for $5 through online sources).
Also a few other comments:
Seven jeans are very plain, theyre soccer mom jeans in a lot of areas and their mens line isnt worth it. Armani is overpriced and very not worth it, you can get better cuts and quality elsewhere. Don’t base your purchases on marketing and company image. Bose makes their speakers seem amazing with real high quality sound and stylish designs, and many many people believe this, but the reality is that they’re overpriced crap speakers that rely on good marketing to sell.
You can get really stylish nice clothes that are still casual. Dressing better doesn’t mean dressing more formally or in striped button down shirts all the time.
Interesting article: http://www.behindthelabel.org/infocus.asp?id=84
In my opinion, it’s about being progressive with design and pushing the boundaries in the way women are perceived and portrayed by the media. I find it refreshing to see regular women in American Apparel’s advertising as opposed to the tanorexic stick monsters we’re all used to. Maybe they want me to think that eh?
Furthermore of course the company wants to sell the product but at least they’re being original about it… If people can’t see past corporate identity, then they deserve for their clothes to fall apart anyway.
You are right.
AA has brilliant marketing. Simple, and perfect for the target audience.
Progressive, edgy, socially conscious. Yet ordinary. Consumer porn.
And think of all the money they save on models.
I wonder if this would work for other than “address most basic needs category” products.
Ponds is doing the same with using “real ” models.
I hope this ends up empowering the consumer.
We are in for more snapshot style advertising- even banks have been using the trend in their print materials.
Honestly? I see what you’re saying, and if that was what their ads did for me I would totally agree with you. But these girls are NOT normal 20-somethings… Okay, so the site says they’re all over 18, but if so then they’re late bloomers. When I see their photos I think of 15 year olds sending tripod+timer photos of themselves to dirty old men on myspace. Particularly because the girls don’t smile. They look like they’ve been abducted and are being starved and exploited by evil people.
To be fair, the ad you posted is not at all like the majority of their ads I’ve seen. If all their ads were like this one I would not be bothered. Does the cutie at the cafe look like this? http://www.americanapparel.net/presscenter/ads/
I would love to buy the clothes.. I dig colors. I dig the choice in cuts. I love the fact that they don’t have logos and that the clothes aren’t made in sweatshops. But for some reason they remind me of human trafficking and sweat shops of another sort. And I’m told this is progressive.
Sorry, I didn’t realize this was such an old article - now i feel silly for posting it. Its just the umpteenth time I’ve run across what I think is a very creepy ad by these guys, so I was googling around reading other people’s opinions. I enjoyed reading your article and agree with your opinion - just.. not of them! ;-)
I happen to love their clothes and that’s all I wanted to say.
i recently started working for AA and also am a photographer… i have to say … this article was a nice read… with the previous comments towords AA’s models looking like there under 18 and abducted… i think that was undeserved… the cool thing about AA is that most of these models start out as employees… whenever an employee comes up with a cool way to where somethign, because as many of you know most of the aparrel jhere can be worn differently, his or her photo is posted on our employee intranet… also they support ameateur photography wich you can view on their website…. and recently held bi anual employee model searches…. with the winners being displaye donline and in the product catalog….
Write Your Own Comment
To preserve legitimate discussion, please use your real name and email address.
Your email address will not be published. Derogatory comments will be deleted.
External Discussion
Displaying the only trackback.
Crunchy Mustard » Geek…
Oh, and go read some “real” marketing analysis of AA here. It still doesn’t make me want to buy the shirt (or glasses?) This…
So if I think that this is all a load of horseshit, does that make me an economically-backward sociopath, or just an educated human being? I think I heard three suckers being born for each of the few minutes I spent reading the article. Well-written, though, as always.