<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pluralists, pioneers and poseurs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialuxe.com/2007/12/pluralists-pioneers-and-poseurs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialuxe.com/2007/12/pluralists-pioneers-and-poseurs/</link>
	<description>A publication about social media, culture and consumerism by Eston Bond in the heart of Silicon Valley.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 23:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://socialuxe.com/2007/12/pluralists-pioneers-and-poseurs/#comment-18942</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyalineskies.com/2007/12/pluralists-pioneers-and-poseurs/#comment-18942</guid>
		<description>This was a great read.

I do agree that the Internet will hopefully alleviate some of the power the major media companies have over trends. The beauty of the Internet lies in the fact that it is an active medium, instead of a passive one like the media of &#039;yore&#039;. You search for what you want. It is very individualistic. However, with that, advertisers are starting to clue in on how to take advantage of the &#039;activeness&#039;. The Internet is not immune, although one could hope it provides an avenue to awareness for some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a great read.</p>
<p>I do agree that the Internet will hopefully alleviate some of the power the major media companies have over trends. The beauty of the Internet lies in the fact that it is an active medium, instead of a passive one like the media of &#8216;yore&#8217;. You search for what you want. It is very individualistic. However, with that, advertisers are starting to clue in on how to take advantage of the &#8216;activeness&#8217;. The Internet is not immune, although one could hope it provides an avenue to awareness for some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prinicples &#38; Purity &#171; Calculated Thought in a Random Universe</title>
		<link>http://socialuxe.com/2007/12/pluralists-pioneers-and-poseurs/#comment-17406</link>
		<dc:creator>Prinicples &#38; Purity &#171; Calculated Thought in a Random Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyalineskies.com/2007/12/pluralists-pioneers-and-poseurs/#comment-17406</guid>
		<description>[...] Prinicples &amp;&#160;Purity  I am currently in the process of a MySpace transformation, hence I will no longer succumb to the basic design layout given to me by my friend Tom. So, I am now learning all about CSS that I will incorporate in my page and naturally all the information I need is on the Web. In my travels on the information superhighway looking for better MySpace designs, I stumbled across a profound post penned (well, typed) by Eston Bond called Pluralists, pioneers and poseurs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Prinicples &amp;&nbsp;Purity  I am currently in the process of a MySpace transformation, hence I will no longer succumb to the basic design layout given to me by my friend Tom. So, I am now learning all about CSS that I will incorporate in my page and naturally all the information I need is on the Web. In my travels on the information superhighway looking for better MySpace designs, I stumbled across a profound post penned (well, typed) by Eston Bond called Pluralists, pioneers and poseurs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Mayfield</title>
		<link>http://socialuxe.com/2007/12/pluralists-pioneers-and-poseurs/#comment-16947</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Mayfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyalineskies.com/2007/12/pluralists-pioneers-and-poseurs/#comment-16947</guid>
		<description>Fantastic post Eston. Yours is one of my new favorite blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic post Eston. Yours is one of my new favorite blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luke</title>
		<link>http://socialuxe.com/2007/12/pluralists-pioneers-and-poseurs/#comment-13483</link>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyalineskies.com/2007/12/pluralists-pioneers-and-poseurs/#comment-13483</guid>
		<description>A really nice post ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ it got me thinking..

I&#039;m reminded of a song by Blur, with the lyrics &#039;..we wear the same clothes because we feels the same&#039; ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ because doing so helps us to feel included in something .. part of the pack.  

Now that geographic boundaries are becoming less pronounced (and are loosing their original function) society is become more tribal, and perhaps feudal.  I agree with what I thought your article was suggesting ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ it does seems to be that individualism is becoming less sort after.

Increasingly so, I can&#039;t see a favourable top down world view that&#039;s worth believing in ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ and I think this is true for many people.  Our ideologies have to be appropriated from elsewhere ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ and when we have free choice (as opposed to a dogmatic &amp; prescribed world-view) maybe we are all sometimes guilty of erring on the side of caution by following.

The individual experience of childhood, is lost to the strong desire to &#039;fit in&#039; during teenage years - and I think that McLuhan (okay, groan) was right when he suggested that this is what&#039;s happening with recent society.  Being &#039;with it&#039; means accepting and following.  Marketers have just realised that our desire to be &#039;with it&#039; is strong and monopolise on this ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ and because connotation-as-a-device is so potent (and most marketers don&#039;t see themselves as artists), original meaning can be seen as irrelevant..

The idea of society itself being in a teenage state makes some sense to me.  Childhood seems to be getting shorter, but the teenage wilderness years seem to be starting earlier (tweens) and ending later   (pressures to get married and have children before 30 aren&#039;t so prominent ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ we&#039;re living longer, etc).  

What I&#039;m interested in, is what&#039;s next ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ if society is still in it&#039;s &#039;teenage years&#039;, what will the &#039;grown up&#039; years be like?  Are we destined to sheepism for ever?  Has it always been like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A really nice post ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ it got me thinking..</p>
<p>I&#8217;m reminded of a song by Blur, with the lyrics &#8216;..we wear the same clothes because we feels the same&#8217; ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ because doing so helps us to feel included in something .. part of the pack.  </p>
<p>Now that geographic boundaries are becoming less pronounced (and are loosing their original function) society is become more tribal, and perhaps feudal.  I agree with what I thought your article was suggesting ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ it does seems to be that individualism is becoming less sort after.</p>
<p>Increasingly so, I can&#8217;t see a favourable top down world view that&#8217;s worth believing in ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ and I think this is true for many people.  Our ideologies have to be appropriated from elsewhere ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ and when we have free choice (as opposed to a dogmatic &amp; prescribed world-view) maybe we are all sometimes guilty of erring on the side of caution by following.</p>
<p>The individual experience of childhood, is lost to the strong desire to &#8216;fit in&#8217; during teenage years &#8211; and I think that McLuhan (okay, groan) was right when he suggested that this is what&#8217;s happening with recent society.  Being &#8216;with it&#8217; means accepting and following.  Marketers have just realised that our desire to be &#8216;with it&#8217; is strong and monopolise on this ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ and because connotation-as-a-device is so potent (and most marketers don&#8217;t see themselves as artists), original meaning can be seen as irrelevant..</p>
<p>The idea of society itself being in a teenage state makes some sense to me.  Childhood seems to be getting shorter, but the teenage wilderness years seem to be starting earlier (tweens) and ending later   (pressures to get married and have children before 30 aren&#8217;t so prominent ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ we&#8217;re living longer, etc).  </p>
<p>What I&#8217;m interested in, is what&#8217;s next ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“ if society is still in it&#8217;s &#8216;teenage years&#8217;, what will the &#8216;grown up&#8217; years be like?  Are we destined to sheepism for ever?  Has it always been like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daustralala</title>
		<link>http://socialuxe.com/2007/12/pluralists-pioneers-and-poseurs/#comment-12341</link>
		<dc:creator>daustralala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyalineskies.com/2007/12/pluralists-pioneers-and-poseurs/#comment-12341</guid>
		<description>could you just make it more simple?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>could you just make it more simple?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
